Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Your eye color is all wrong, we'll have to kill you

In-vitro fertilization has long been a death arena for the unborn. Human eggs are fertilized and implanted only to have most of them stripped away and killed in the first trimester. Thousands more fertilized eggs, each one a tiny, incredibly young human being, are simply destroyed when they're thawed out and tossed with biological waste.

For years, the frankendoctors responsible for these mass murders have allowed parents to selectively destroy young infants based on gender. This form of infanticide was so widespread in the United Kingdom that the practice of aborting infants based in gender was outlawed in Great Britain.

Now the so called "doctors" have taken their abhorrent practices one step further, allowing parents to abort an infant based on hair color, eye color and skin color.

Custom-made babies delivered: Fertility clinic doctor's design-a-kid offer creates uproar

Choose Your Baby’s Eye Color

When the infant is only a few days old, a substantial percentage of the child's cells structure is removed in a biopsy. The cells are then analyzed for genetic defects like profound retardation. The doctors can also determine the child's gender and now, likely eye, skin and hair color. In the past, children with obvious defects, or the wrong gender for the preferences of the parents, were aborted. Their young lives were snuffed out just because they were a girl, and the parents wanted a boy.

Now, couples rendered infertile by God's judgement have a new set of even more trivial criteria for murdering the unborn children God chose not to give them naturally. Does this unborn infant have brown eyes, but you really want one with blue? Abort it. Is this child likely to have a skin color that's a few shades darker than you want? Abort it. Do you want a blond and not a redhead? Abort it. The mind boggle at the deviancy that can lead a parent to murder their own child because it has the wrong eye color. It's no wonder God made these couples infertile to begin with, if they're capable of such barbaric, inhuman actions.

There is, fortunately, an uproar over this mass murder, but confusion about the practice is making the criticism difficult to get through. No new genetic data is being introduced, no genes altered by doctors in the laboratory. What these doctors are doing is creating dozens of siblings in the laboratory, testing them, and then killing the ones who don't conform to the checklist the parents filled out when they started the process. It's difficult calling these people "parents" because there's nothing parental about willingly and cheerfully murdering your own children.

On March 4, 2009, Neurologist Dr Steven Novella warned, "The technology is inevitable, it's just a matter of how the ethics will be perceived... It will be done first for the most horrible genetic diseases then for medical risk factors but once you're doing it It's a short trip each step of the way before you are basically genetically engineering your kids." Novella is himself a pro abortion atheist who is highly critical of scientists who use their faith in God as a guiding principle in their lives. Even he sees where technology like this is going.

3 comments:

dave said...

Let the heathens spill theirs,
on the dusty ground,
God will make them pay
for each sperm that can't be found!

Zarek said...

Wow! Steve from the future! 2209! So you see where this is going, right? In the future we will all be atheists...

Bruce said...

A small group of embryonic stem cells is human cells but not a human being.

They're undifferentiated. No brain cells, heart cells etc. Only one type of cell.

Sure these cells have the potential to develop into a human being, but preventing the creation of a human and killing a human are two very different things. You shouldn't equate the two.

Auctions Ads

Cornswalled's Youtube Videos