Tuesday, November 18, 2008

B Hussein Obama denied security clearance

Free Republic, whose site has been taken offline, apparently by hackers, broke the story that president elect Barack Hussein Obama has been denied the very security clearance he so desperately needs to act as President.

Cliff Kincaid has a summary of reasons why Obama might have been denied security clearance. The list is impressive, and I wish I and more Americans had seen it before the election.

Since Free Republic is down, I'm going to mirror the content of the article here. It's disturbing that we have a man walking to the white house who the DOD doesn't trust with a security clearance. He's already lost the confidence, trust and cooperation of the very people under his command, and he hasn't even taken office yet. Dark times are ahead for America and I fear this may be the twilight of American greatness.

Barack Obama Denied National Security Clearance

How can the President of the United States be denied a basic security clearance? How can the Commander and Chief of the most powerful military be denied access to classified information? Barack Obama would be denied the necessary security clearance for President if he was held to the same standard as everyone else. If you can’t pass a Secret level background investigation, which is required for many soldiers, you should not be eligible for the Presidency.

What is a Security Clearance?

Having served in the U.S. military, law enforcement, and as a civilian government contractor, I’ve had my fair share of background investigations. The United States government employs a multitier security clearance paradigm.

Confidential – Unauthorized disclosure could cause “damage to national security.” Secret – Unauthorized disclosure could cause “serious damage to national security.” Top Secret – Unauthorized disclosure could cause “exceptionally grave damage to national security.”

Each level of access requires a progressively more in-depth background investigation before the clearance is obtained. The President of the United States should be able to flawlessly pass the most extensive investigation and a polygraph test. Both are required for workers in some Special Access Programs classified Top Secret.

The purpose of the clearance is to determine an individual’s honesty, trustworthiness, reliability, financial responsibility, criminal activity, emotional stability, foreign influences, family associations, drug use, mental health, judicial proceedings, employment history, traits of character, and loyalty to the United States. This collective data is used to evaluate your ability and willingness to safeguard national secrets. Based on the facts about Barack Obama, he fails to satisfy the minimum requirements for even a basic secret clearance. His background investigation would have “Red Flags” shooting up in so many places; the issuing panel would deny him a clearance outright.

Obama’s Answers on the Security Clearance Application Instead of going through all the Security Clearance Application questions, I’ll examine the questions that would deny Barack Obama a Secret Clearance.

List foreign national relatives whom you or your spouse are bound by affection, obligation, or close and continuing contact.

Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. of Kenya, and Lolo Soetoro, the Indonesian oil manager his mother married. These two foreign relatives would probably initiate a Defensive Security Services or Department of Defense investigation that would take roughly a year to explore. I’m not sure how many degrees of separation are involved, but Obama Sr. and Soetoro’s associations are not friendly to the United States. However, they are not the primary concern.

Barack Obama’s brother, his kin Abongo Obama, is a militant Muslim who has been quoted saying, “A black man must liberate himself from the poisons of European cultures and western values.” Obama’s paternal cousin, Raila Odinga is also a Muslim extremist who recently lost the Kenyan Presidential election to a Christian. How can such relations exist between the President of the United States and radical Muslims?

Have you ever been an officer or a member or made a contribution to an organization dedicated to the violent overthrow of the United States Government and which engages in illegal activities to that end, knowing that the organization engages in such activities with the specific intent to further such activities?

Have you ever knowingly engaged in any acts or activities designed to overthrow the United States Government by force?

These two questions go hand and hand. Having gone through the interview phase of the clearance process a number of times, I can’t image the look on the face of the investigator nor the sheer amount of time it would take to explain Barack Obama’s anti American ties.

Sen. Barack Obama served as a paid director alongside a confessed domestic terrorist and granted funding to a controversial Arab group that dubbed the creation of Israel as a “catastrophe.” The founder of the Arab group in question, Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, also has held a fundraiser for Obama. Khalidi is a harsh critic of Israel, has made statements supportive of Palestinian terror and reportedly has worked on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was involved in anti western terrorism.

Barack Obama also served on the Wood’s Fund board with William Ayers, a member of the Weathermen terrorist group which sought to overthrow of the U.S. government and took responsibility for the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, of the Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972. Bill Ayers has killed hundreds of civilians, police officers, and was recently quoted saying, “I don’t regret setting bombs, I feel we didn’t do enough.”

I would deny a security clearance for anybody that even shook these men’s hands, never mind launching a campaign from Ayer’s living room.

Have you illegally used any controlled substance, for example, marijuana, cocaine, crack cocaine, hashish, narcotics (opium, morphine, codeine, heroin, etc.), amphetamines, depressants (barbiturates, methaqualone, tranquilizers, etc.), hallucinogenics (LSD, PCP, etc.), or prescription drugs?

Barack Obama has specifically admitted to using marijuana and cocaine in his book “Dreams From My Father.” He even confesses pursuing heroin, but was scared of the drug dealer. A clearance question such as this is used to test someone’s ethical fortitude to stand up for what is right, legally forbidden, and ultimately make correct decisions. Obama fails this test with his weakness to deny temptation.

Would anyone question your honesty?

Obama’s lies regarding his recollection of policies supported and the reality of what he actually did endorse are too numerous to count. However, these lies are unfortunately common in today’s politics. An article written in a conservative blog has outlined 26 more personal deceptions Obama has made to the American people. How can anyone trust this guy with confidence?

Evolutionists stumped again: Junk DNA isn't junk

In a discovery that's sending shock waves though Evolution strongholds, Yale scientists have discovered the function of so-called "Junk" DNA. In so doing, they've dealt a humiliating blow to geneticists worldwide, and thrown the safety and wisdom of genetic manipulation onto doubt.

DNA is the blueprint carried in each cell that dictates how bodies are constructed. Some of it contains the code for how to build various proteins, but because scientists didn't know what the rest of the DNA did, they labeled it, as much as 95% of an organism's DNA, "Junk DNA" indicating they thought it served no functions.

The claim that human DNA differs from, for example, Chimpanzee DNA by only 2% is based on the DNA whose function scientists know, the 5% that codes for known proteins. The other 95%, the "Junk DNA" that scientists have been unable to figure out differs vastly between organisms, some species having twice the volume of "Junk" DNA as others.

What science has learned is that this DNA, 95% of an organism's DNA in some cases, actually dictates HOW the proteins in the other 5% are used. To use a construction analogy, 5% of our DNA tells the contractors how to mix the mortar, the other 95% contains information on the actual blueprint, how to dig the foundation, how to lay wiring and plumbing and all the other details of building the house. Before now, scientists thought only the directions on how to mix mortar were relevant to building the house, and all the plans for the kitchen, the cabinets and the bathrooms were waste paper to be ignored.

Ironically, this comes after decades of speculation about HOW the known 5% managed to build a human being, even though it only contained directions of how to make proteins. They were mystified at the fact that they saw no mechanism for controlling the known DNA, no way to control which proteins were produced and how many were manufactured. It's been more than half a century since Watson discovered DNA, and it wasn't until now that scientists thought to look at the "Junk DNA" for clues.

Researchers are currently doing damage control, claiming that this discovery is a window into how evolution works and saying it only encodes how the thumb is formed, but that the rest of the "Junk DNA" is still junk.

What about the claim there's only a 2% difference between us and a worm?

That claim has been blown to atoms. The claim was already on shaky ground, having been based on the 5% whose function we knew. There's a 2% difference in the proteins used to build a slug and to build a human being, but that's just in one building component. The same blocks can make many things. The wood, mortar and steel that can be used to build a shack on the edge of town can, in larger quantities, better blueprints and more skilled workers, build a mansion or a church.

The other 95% of our DNA is wholly and completely different from that of a worm. We have more chromosomes (strands of DNA) but scientists didn't know what they did so they assumed they did nothing. It would be more accurate to say that we share only about 5% of our DNA with worms, if you count the "Junk DNA" scientists haven't unraveled yet.

What about Genetically Modified (GM) food?

Scientists have spent decades swapping DNA between organisms. Splicing jellyfish DNA into corn for example, in an attempt to make crops that are more productive and, so you HAVE to buy seed again year after year, sterile after the first season. The wisdom of this freakish game of mix and match was based on the assumption that the genetic differences between species were minimal. The discovery that 95% of the DNA, the percentage that varies wildly between species, has a function, throws the very foundation of genetic modification into disarray.

In the past, scientists thought of mixing and matching DNA as a plumbing job. You can swap out a valve here or a sink there to get a small change but it would leave the rest of the building untouched. Now they know that they have NO clue how the proteins are controlled in different species, or what changing one will do to others. To make matters worse, none of their methods of genetic manipulation were designed to leave "Junk DNA", the DNA that controls the rest of the organism, intact.

It would be a bit like replacing the TV in your house, but scrambling up your electrical wiring in the process, under the assumption that the electrical wiring was irrelevant and unnecessary. What's going to happen when you turn on that TV? What if you, in a genetic sense, hooked a 220 line up to a TV designed for 110? Do you REALLY want corn built with such dangers in your food?

In Conclusion

Genetic researchers have been blown a crippling and humiliating blow. Everything they thought they knew has been overturned, and instead of being on the cusp of the biological godhood they fantasized about, they've learned they're only tinkering with some building blocks. The small child with his first set of foam blocks has learned that he isn't an architect designing skyscrapers, and it's a humiliating and humbling revelation.

The next few months will be a trial for the charlatans calling themselves geneticists. If they spin this discovery right, if they sweep the real implications under the rug and fool enough people they can keep milking their dabbling for all it's worth. They want to keep playing God with a rubber band and a toothpick. If the public sees this discovery for what it is, the house of cards, and the entire field of genetic research, may very well crumble.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Red Ink: Texas: Larry Sinclair, Obama's bad penny

Obama's alleged secret gay past is being deftly covered up by the suspicious deaths of suspected former paramours. The only known former gay lover to still be alive seems to have survived by releasing a video on youtube confessing his past with Obama. He's since been harassed by the police and arrested under trumped up counterfeiting charges on the order of Joe Biden's son.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Red ink has a more complete write up.

Obama's former lovers being killed off?

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

A frightening quote

You know, I can't read the ... articles that are relevant to my practice [in Neurology] that come out every year. I actually reply upon other people to do the hours of work.

- Steven Novella, leader of the Atheist Skeptical Movement on the November 5, 2008 Episode of his podcast

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Will Obama sit in the Oval Office?

Obama has lied to us about his religion and his citizenship. Now his legal team is blocking efforts to force him to produce his birth certificate. The Governor of Hawaii has locked his alleged birth certificate up and evidence is mounting that Obama was actually born in Kenya, not the United States of America. A Kenyan birth would, according to the constitution, make hm ineligible for the presidency. We can only hope that his web of deceit will unravel before he's sworn in. The only real question is, if Obama's lies are revealed before he's sworn in, who will be President? Bidden, even though he himself hadn't been sworn in as Vice President? Speaker of the House? McCain, as the runner up?

Obama may have been elected, but because he's ineligible we still don't know who will be the next president.

IM with a Liberal

I love how he starts off loving Obama but by the end of the conversation claims he voted for McCain. Liberals even flip-flop in a single conversation! Their lies and self deceotion would be amusing if they didn;t keep screwing up the country.

Tuesday November 6, 2008
buzz.: OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sent at 11:01 AM on Thursday
me: Happy that a white hating Muslim is you new president?
He'll never take office though, The legal challenges to force him to prove his citizenship will flush out his lies,

buzz.: really? who is making these challenges?

Sent at 11:08 AM on Thursday
me: http://comments.obamacrimes.com/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/28/lawsuit-questions-obamas-eligibility-for-office/

buzz.: ill have to take a look at those and see if they ease my supposed fears of the white hating muslim that is now going to be in office

Sent at 11:11 AM on Thursday
me: Obama isn't a citizen, and once that comes out he'll be arrested and deported for spitting on the constitution.

Sent at 11:12 AM on Thursday
buzz.: you dont actually think that the Democratic party would run someone that was not a citizen do you?
that is just such a lame excuse

Sent at 11:14 AM on Thursday
me: The Republicans ran Palin without knowing her husband was trying to get Alaska to leave the United States, and he was open about that. Why would the Dumocrats catch something Obama has spent 20 years hiding?
His web of lies is well made, and it survived the Democrats' poor follow up. It wasn't until an opponent dug deeper that the truth came out.

buzz.: they ran Governess Palin to help John McCains image and it helped him keep it close

me: So? Does that means they should not have done a background check?

Sent at 11:18 AM on Thursday
me: So Obama didn't need a background check because he was the first serious black candidate? Is running a black man more important than running a man who is an actual citizen?

buzz.: i think that they should do extensive background checks on everyone around them. If as you say is true that Tom Palin wanted Alaska to leave the US then it is called an opinion and not a terrorist threat

Sent at 11:20 AM on Thursday
buzz.: race should not be a part of this discussion, and for the record I am a heterosexual 29 year old white male that lives in Quacker country just to clear that up

me: He was a member of Alaska's secessionist party. Do you know what the term "secessionist" means?

buzz.: yeah i do and while I have had fun i need to get back to work

me: Just what I expected. You liberals think it's OK for Obama to pal around with terrorists like the weather underground and you think it's OK to be part of a political party whose whole POINT is to get a state to leave the union. Typical behavior for America hating Liberals.

Sent at 11:22 AM on Thursday
me: What's the matter little boy? You ran up, made your jabs and now don't like the fact that I ripped your claims to shreds? Obama isn't a citizen and he will never sit in the Oval Office. The America hating liberals backing him will get theirs when they go to jail for trying to get a non-citizen into the white house.

buzz.: the fact that you think I am an America hating Liberal is hillarious, since I actually voted for McCain because I didn't trust Obama. You are insane by the way

Sent at 11:24 AM on Thursday
me: You voted for Mccain and yet you know nothing about him or his running mate. You don't trust Obama and yet you knew nothing about his past even though it's all over the Internet. Do the country a favor and the next time you vote, learn a little about the election and the candidates first.

DC loses, but the family wins

Even as Washington DC was being prepared to have a non-citizen Muslim become President California was putting an end to Gay Marriage once and for all.

The United States Constitution is "The Law of the Land" the highest human law recognized by the government and legal system. Nothing can overrule it. What many people don;t know is that in addition to the nation's constitution, each US State has it's own constitution. Just as the US Constitution trumps all other law, so does a State constitution trump all other laws within the state.

On the very day the Kenyan was elected to the residency, California voted to amend their state constitution to ban gay marriage, nullifying all the gay marriages that occurred in California to date. This means the only quasi legal gay marriages in America are ones that occurred In Massachusetts.

This is a major step forward in the battle to preserve marriage and even though the state of California voted for a foreign born president, I salute them for voting down the moral and legal deviancy of homosexuality.

God Bless America. We need it because of Obama , but recent events in California reveal that God still favors us in many ways.

Financial Markets Collapse on news of Obama Victory.

He's not even in office yet, but Obama has already turned a recession into a new Depression. The mere news of his victory has caused several foreign stock markets to collapse. The steady gains of the last few weeks have already crumbled, leaving the world in even worse shape at the earlier depths of the economic troubles. Perhaps it's Obama's extreme socialist views that have even left wing Europeans frightened by the prospect of his presidency. Perhaps it's his desire to withdraw from the Middle East unconditionally and immediately, a move that will destabilize the region and threaten the world oil supply.

Whatever the details, now that the dust is settling and the world is seeing a radical Muslim elected to the US Presidency, fear for America's future and the impact it will have on the world has left everyone scrambling.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Tonight I sleep the sleep of the Righteous

The campaign has been long and tiring for the voters, and now it comes to an end. As I prepare for bed, the election is going God's way. Most of the map is turning red, with the only blue states being the East Coast strongholds of liberalism. I just saw a story on how McCain has already won the Ohio precincts that gave the state to Bill Clinton during his first run at the presidency.

Obama's defeat is only a matter of time. The United States of America is turning away from an Islamic government and turning its face back to God.

Tonight I sleep soundly, knowing the battle is won, and Obama will be an interesting but irrelevant footnote in presidential history by the time I awake.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Is voting for Obama a federal crime?



Since knowingly aiding an ineligible person to be elected to office is a federal felony, it's possible that anyone who knows Obama is not a citizen would be committing a federal crime by voting for Obama.

Is Obama worth the risk of prison?

Vote no to Islamic control of the United States. Vote for McCain.

Auctions Ads

Cornswalled's Youtube Videos