Warning: The following text contains frank discussion of human sexuality. While all efforts have been made not to appeal to prurient interests in the following text this is not intended for underage readers.
Humanist society is rife with sexual myths designed to lead people to lives of promiscuity and sin. The myth that you can prevent pregnancy by jumping up and down after intercourse for example, is a lie told by deviant men seeking to seduce young women.
Most of these myths are centuries old. The myth of the female orgasm for example was created by Renaissance Era Libertines seeking to encourage promiscuity in women. By encouraging them to seek increasingly more adventurous sexual relations with a wide range of partners, they created a stable of willing and submissive whores.
One of the newest myths however is only a few decades old. Based upon the myth of female orgasm, the tall tale of the Grafenberg-Spot (G-Spot) promises not just intense physical pleasure, but pleasure above and beyond anything ever before described. Something of a sexual morphine, it further encourages loose women to seek out different partners in the vain hope of finding one who can "hit the spot" and give her the much promised, but never delivered, sexual nirvana.
Let's look at the evidence, the hard facts surrounding the G-Spot:
Scientists have used ultrasound technology to locate a spongy mass about where the G-Spot is supposed to be located.
That's it. All the other claims about the G-Spot boil down to subjective claims made by people who are happy to participate in sexual relations in a laboratory. More reliable scientists have described the G-Spot as:
“a sort of gynecological UFO: much searched for, much discussed, but unverified by objective means.”
Whenever women complain that they can't find their G-Spot they're told that "Not everyone has one."
The absurdity of this claim is obvious. If it were indeed a static, anatomical trait then why would it be missing in a massive percentage of the population? Wouldn't centuries of dissection and examination have found SOMETHING to support the claim that the G-Spot exists? Why would a loving God give some people the ability to experience this astounding pleasure but deny it to others?
There's no real evidence for the G-Spot outside of wishful thinking and deviant desires. There is however ample evidence against it.
If this magical spot actually existed, why, in 6,000 years of human history, has it never been described until the 1970's? It would have been encountered countless times in the course of marital relations and yet no one mentions it.
Descriptions on how to stimulate this area make it clear that it would be stimulated during child birth. If it existed and if it were as powerful as described, women would have pleasure during child birth. This runs against medical and biblical information about child birth.
The Bible contains warnings about the immoral use of God's gifts, including the misuse of sexual pleasure. A good deal is said about the pleasure of intercourse for both men and women, why then, is such an intense pleasure never even alluded to?
The fact that the G-Spot's own proponents claim that not all women have one is the dead giveaway. Their perverse rationale seems to be that if you can't find your G-Spot, then CLEARLY you're either to sexually repressed to unwind enough to locate it, or you just don't have one. Instead of admitting it;s a fantasy, they pass the buck, first to men and then to biology.
The claim that not all women have one, but some do, is another attempt to reinforce Darwinian lies. The goal is clearly to portray those who have a G-Spot as being more "evolved" than those who do not. Is this a deliberate attempt to further elevate deviant humanists or just a bonus for their cover up tall tales.
In his book 1984, George Orwell referred to the Communist party researching ways to remove the pleasure from sex. Making women spend their time lusting after a mythical pleasure spot that doesn't exist strikes me as a very effective means of doing just that.
