Sunday, September 30, 2007

18 Ways to be a good liberal

1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and
governments create prosperity.
3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens
are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands
of Chinese and North Korean communists.
4. You have to believe that there was no art before federal funding.
5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by
cyclical changes in the earth's climate and more affected by soccer
moms driving SUV's.
6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial, but being
homosexual is natural.
7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of
federal funding.
8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach
4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids
about sex.
9. You have to believe that hunters don't care about nature, but PETA
activists do.
10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than
actually doing something to earn it.
11. You have to believe that Mel Gibson spent $25 million of his own
money to make "The Passion of the Christ" for financial gain only.
12. You have to blieve the NRA is bad because it supports certain
parts of the Constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports
certain parts of the Constitution.
13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.
14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are
more important to American history than Thomas Jefferson, Gen. Robert
E. Lee, and Thomas Edison.
15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial
quotas and set-asides are not.
16. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked
anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in
charge.
17. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag queens
and transvestites should be constitutionally protected, and manger
scenes at Christmas should be illegal.
18. You have to believe that this message is a part of a vast,
right-wing conspiracy.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Google Adsense

Has anyone else ever gotten a message similar to the one below from Google Adsense?

Our program specialists regularly review sites in the AdSense program. We have reviewed your site, www.cornswalled.com, and found that we are unable to display ads that would provide a valuable experience for your site's users or our advertisers. As we feel that the site isn't a good fit for the AdSense program at this time, we have disabled ad serving to the site.

Podcast Reviews Part 2

More podcast reviews, this time for Keith and the Girl and Paper Bag Radio.

Polyamory Weekly responded to my review.

I address questions about my name and accusations of it being a pseudonym, as well as answer the question of why I no longer refer to myself as "Reverend."

Friday, September 28, 2007

Calling out the Commies

With all they hype out there about the communist "Open Source" community it's refreshing when a voice of reason pops the bubble and reveals that Open Sores is powered by hype and lies.

Here's one of my favorites.

Firefox Myths

It really rips apart the pack of lies and deceit that holds together the fiction that Firefox is worth a download.

Stick with Internet Explorer folks. Unless your computer is crippled by an inferior piece of garbage like Linux or Apple it came with your computer.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Now on Podcast Alley

My Podcast Alley feed! {pca-b57c2e24a1acee5e763272c2209554ce}

Podcast Reviews

This is only my fourth Podcast, and already I'm getting far more attention than I expected. Within minutes of posting my first Podcast I received an e-mail asking:

"Corny, when are you going to do a Drunk show?"

A Drunk show is, predictably, when someone records a Podcast while intoxicated. This is apparently popular among some types of Podcasters. I can assure my listeners that, as I've never drunk and do not intend to drink, this will not happen. Communion wine is not sufficient to get one drunk.

The next bit of attention I received was from a Podcaster with whom I've had an ongoing battle of wills. Some months ago, I was sent a Podcast that started with clips of the Lesbian Lilly Tomlin verbally abusing her director. I found this amusing. The rest of the podcast however was NOT amusing. It featured a bit entitled "Sextastic Tuesday" and featured the host of the Podcast, a Timothy James Henson, reading a story in which a 12 year old girl is violently raped by a supernatural monster.

I began a petition to get the podcast dropped by its hosting provider, and contacted law enforcement regarding the Podcast. My efforts got the attention of the Podcast's host and his fans, the self described "Distorted View Freaks."

That's right, they call themselves "The Freaks." Never before have fans been more appropriately named.

To make a long story short, there were three consequences to this battle.

First, Timothy Henson made a point of editing his stories to make all participants of legal age. He failed to add the age verification barriers I proposed as a compromise, but he at least removed the blatantly pedophiliac slant to his program.

Second, my webmaster received word that Google was blocking www.cornswalled.com from displaying Google ads. As the ads had never resulted in any ad revenue, I did not consider this a loss.

Third and finally, after some months of debate, Timothy Henson discontinued the "Sextastic Tuesday" bit all together. He claimed this was due to a lack of quality stories, but it was clear from the content of his program that "quality" was never a consideration.

On September 19, 2007, I received an e-mail from my webmaster informing me that Timothy Henson had discussed my podcast on his own program.

(The Podcast text differs significantly from the written text in the following three paragraphs, because audio clips from Distorted View were incorporated into the Podcast)

In it he admitted that he had not listened to my podcast but claimed that I stated I'd be a bigger success than Tim Henson because I had God on my side. He then played a series of clips in which words and word fragments had been taken from my podcast and reworked into sentences I never uttered. This is a common bit of parody called a "Mash-up."

I never made ANY claims about how popular my Podcast would be. Henson was misinformed on that point.

To Mr Henson, I say this. You criticized me for failing to listen to the entirety of your episodes before criticizing you. I responded to this criticism by listening to several episodes of your own program. From then on, I did not comment on an episode of "Distorted View" unless I had listened to the entire episode.

I simply request that you show me the same courtesy I showed you, that is to listen to my podcast before commenting on it. It's a lesson You taught Me and a lesson I appreciate.

On the topic of Podcasts, my ongoing battle with Henson resulted in my fellow parishioners learning a good deal about Podcasts, and for several weeks I've been receiving requests from parents to review the podcasts their children have been listening to and to tell them what I think. Some of them lack the technical expertise to listen to a podcast, and others who hold down multiple jobs simply lack the time to listen to a few hours of programming. I've been on the Church's Childhood Media Review board for over seven years, so it was only natural for me to take on this responsibility.

The following Podcasts are being listened to by the children of my fellow parishioners. The children did not provide these on their own, but their parents simply went into their computers and found what was there. This will be the first of several Podcast review episodes as there is a good deal of material to get through.

Unless otherwise stated, I listened to a minimum of three episodes for each podcast.

I've already discussed Distorted View. It has been banned for a while. No one listens to it at my church. It's a corruption we all know to avoid.

Nobody Likes Onions.

I expected a cute kids' show when I read the title, and was shocked to learn of the show's content. I only listened to one episode of this rambling, deviant program. The episode consisted to two segments. In the first, a flagrantly homosexual host was debating with the other two hosts about the "gayness" of a sex act involving two men. In the second segment they complained that a supposedly suicidal friend of theirs had not committed suicide, and encouraged him to do so.

The program contains profanity, discusses graphic homosexual acts and advocates suicide. I encourage any parent who encounters this program on their child's computer delete it immediately and have a frank discussion with their child about Christian entertainment.

The Dawn and Drew Show

The next Podcast, and the most popular, was one entitled "The Dawn and Drew Show." I listened to three episodes of this program and found it to be boring, profanity laced, graphic and repetitive. The program consists largely of a married couple talking about how great they are.

While it is graphic in content, that is not why I'm advising parents don't let their kids listen to it. It's vapid, and about as worthwhile a form of entertainment as the average sitcom. Aside from containing unChristian themes, it is time wasted. Delete it from their computers and direct them to more worthwhile pursuits.

Crap from the Past

This weekly Podcast is 90 minutes long, and consists of three separate 30 minute files, making it the longest per episode podcast I reviewed. It's also been available for 15 years, making it the oldest. It's a music program dedicated to popular music of the 60's 70's and 80's with some newer music. In terms of it being appropriate for Christian listeners, it's comparable to Top 40 Radio back when Casey Chasm was the host.

Parents should treat this podcast the same way they would treat a radio station.

A Prairie Home Companion, the news from Lake Wobegon

Given the Baby Boomer and older demographic of the program I was surprised to find the Liberal slanted "wobegon monologs" among those listened to by teenagers. The program originated with American Public Radio, and the traditional liberal slant is obvious. Traditional values and small town life are mocked every week.

Delete it if you see it, but don't panic. It just means your kid likes drivel or dislikes Lutherans.

Hometown Tales

This Podcast is all about Urban Legends, Ghost stories and the like. The Hosts rarely try to debunk anything, but the hosts tend to offer rational explanations for urban legends where appropriate. I gave our pastor a copy of the episode "A Real No Talent Guy" which he plans to use as source material for an upcoming Christmas Sermon. Despite lacking any real Christian influence, I consider it a perfectly safe, even entertaining secular program.

There is no profanity or adult themes, and I recommend parents listen to it with their children as "Family time."

This American Life

From American Public Radio, it's a blatantly liberal highly political "Stories about Liberals in distress" program. Think of it as the Lifetime Channel for Liberals.

Delete it if you see it.

Open Source Sex

This Podcast is graphic, undisguised and unapologetic pornography. The host "Violet Blue" lives in San Francisco. I think that tells you all you need to know about her. This is the only podcast for which I did not listen to an entire episode.

This show is pornography. My computer started showing a slideshow of naked people with whips when I hit "play" and things went downhill from there. If you find it on your child's computer delete it and bring your child to your pastor or a Christian counselor immediately.

Polyamory Weekly

This is easily the most dangerous and socially destructive podcast I've ever heard. The program is about Polyamory, the practice of having multiple sexual partners, provided everyone consents and knows what's going on. It advocates just about every form of perversion you can imagine and the host frequently decries the fact that group marriages aren't legal in the United States.

The program is not the most sexually explicit, nor is it the most offensive. It's dangerous because the program seeks to normalize Homosexuality, Bisexuality, wife swapping, bondage and a host of other unChristian behaviors. They side AGAINST the Mormons who want to legalize underage brides, but if all those Mormon brides are 18 or older, they're all for it.

If your child is listening to Polyamory Weekly, then I recommend you respond as if you'd found deviant magazines in their possession. Do not react with anger, as that will only make matters worse, but respond with Christian love and understanding. Your child has been exposed to dangerous and radical ideas, and needs help with the confusion of ideas that such exposure can create.

That's all for now. I'll post another batch of Podcast Reviews once I have the chance to listen to some more.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Should New York REALLY Rename the GWB?

A few weeks ago I posted about the grassroots movement to rename the George Washington Bridge in New York City to the George W Bush Bridge. I recently added a link to the Podcast feed for this post, but for some reason it isn't showing up in iTunes, so I'm posting a fresh link to the Podcast above.

Hopefully, THIS post to the podcast will show up in the feed.

I've also created a Youtube Video of the podcast.

Betrayed, Bush appoints a Liberal

George W Bush has a long history of standing up for the Right. His appointees have typically come from conservative backgrounds and upheld traditional values.

Even when appointing a Hispanic to government, as he did with Alberto Gonzales, he chose a man who satisfied the Leftist need for an "ethnic" presence in government, while selecting a man who stood up for the Nation's need to defend itself, even against the cowards and hand wringing geldings in Congress.

George W has been a friend to conservative America, at least until he appointed Michael Mukasey to replace Gonzales.

Mukasey is a New York Liberal. His last brush with national notoriety was when Democrat Senator Charles Schumer of New York recommended him for a nomination to the Supreme Court. That's Right, Bush has chosen the Democrat's hand picked, wet dream SCOTUS member as the major legal voice in the White House.

Bush has opened his arms and embraced one of the very activist judges he formerly fought to defeat. Politics makes strange bedfellows indeed.

Mukasey's pro-life record is weak to say the least, having denied political asylum to people who were forced to have abortions in China. Apparently being forced to murder your unborn child doesn't quality as "oppression" to this libtard and his relativistic morals. He's broken with the White House on Terrorism, having made ruling that could streamline the release of known terrorists.

The most damning fact about Mukasey is the enthusiastic reception he's receiving from Congressional Democrats. They're thrilled with the appointment and are expected to not just streamline all approval proceedings, but to welcome him with arms just as open as W.

We can only sit back and watch as Mukasey prepares to aid and abed the Democratic Party's attempts to further erode the authority of the Executive Branch and politicize every tiny action by the current Administration.

The French grow a pair

The BBC is reporting that the French Prime Minster is warning Iran that if they don't back down and halt their Nuclear program, France might invade Iran.

That's right folks, France, the surrender monkeys who welcomed Hitler with open arms, who cowered before Saddam Hussein, who never accomplished ANYTHING militarily without Napoleon are gearing up for war with Iran.

This puts the American Liberals cowering with fear before Iran in a new light. If the FRENCH can stand up to them and prepare for war, how cowardly, how spineless, how PATHETIC must the Democrats be to prefer a Nuclear Iran with intercontinental missiles to a short war and a few years of occupation.

Illegal Immigration

If you want to deal with Illegal Immigration, you first have to realize that Illegal Immigrants fall into four categories. The members of those categories have their own motives for coming to the United States, and despite what people like to think, they need to be addressed separately.

I'll first list the four groups by size, starting with the smallest.

First, there are political refugees. These are the smallest group. Boat People from Cuba are a common example of this kind of immigrant. We already have a host of Immigration policies for dealing with these people, and the main way to deal with them is with improved detection.

Next, there are folks who come here for purely criminal purposes. Yes, coming here illegally is a crime, but this group of Illegals are here to do things like smuggle drugs. Harsher criminal sentencing and increased use of deportation can help deal with this crowd.

Third, are the loafers here to leech off the welfare state. If private charities stepped up to the bat and took over the functions Liberals like to claim the welfare state performs, we could dissolve the welfare state, and leave these leeches out in the cold. As it is, simply denying welfare and medical services to illegals would eliminate this group. A wild sponge can't survive if there's no water for it to soak up.

Finally, there's the largest group. The illegal and unlicensed workers. Yes, there's a good deal of overlap with the first three groups, but most illegals come to the USA to work illegally, making a fraction of what American workers earn for the same jobs.

In the past, attempts to deal with this massive group has lead to accusations of racism. These absurd claims are made by Liberals who are determined to use the race card to stir up their constituents. In 2007, With the Liberals holding a majority in the House and the Senate, a real solution to Illegal Immigration requires a plan that even liberals can get behind.

What then, do we do? How do we get the Liberals to do something about Illegal Immigration? The answer is simple. We combine fighting Illegals with something Liberals solve. Specifically, we create a way for us to attack Illegal Immigration while letting Liberals attack Capitalism and American Business.

Hear me out on this. Who pays these illegals? Who forks over the cash to hire these people? American Business owners, that's who. They know they're hurting the US Economy, and helping to bleed money out of the USA and into third world countries, but they persist in hiring illegals. They're traitors, not just to the Americans they SHOULD hire, but to America and her Economy. These bastards don't deserve our respect, and the problems they've created make them worthy of our vengeance.

The plan then is to bring an iron fist down on these bastards. Show them the full brunt of American Justice for hiring Illegal Immigrants. I don't care if the illegal is from Mexico, Canada, Great Britain, Pakistan, Ireland or anywhere else. Compared to the US Economy the rest of the world IS third world, and coddling businessmen who would destroy America and her citizens is something that needs to stop.

Once the jobs go away, the illegals who are here to work will be forced to leave as well. An entire category of illegals will vanish within a few years of locking away and fining the bastards who hire them. If we've already dissolved the welfare state, at least for illegals, then they won't have a fallback position.

Conservatives can support this plan, because traitors who are hiring illegals will be fined and imprisoned.

Liberals can get behind this plan because they'll be imprisoning and fining American Businessmen for violating regulations.

Even the advocate groups for various Legal Immigrant populations can get behind this because by and large a bunch of rich, white US born Citizens are being thrown in jail. If they try to accuse us of racism, we can counter by accusing THEM of claiming ALL Hispanics are Illegal Immigrants. "All we're doing is fining people who hire illegals" we can say, "What has that got to do with Hispanics who were BORN in the USA or who have Green Cards?"

The best part is, if we start with a bunch of high profile cases where we crack down on companies hiring Illegals from Canada and Europe the Liberals won't have a chance to play the race card when we start in on other illegal groups.

All we need to do is create a chilling effect to make people scared to hire an illegal. Once that's done, millions of them will leave, and the rest will commit crimes for which we can imprison or deport them with ease.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Atheists lack a moral center

#794278

<JohnDough> man being an athiest is so awesome, as long as you don't tell anybody
<JohnDough> i testified against my stepmom (whom i hate) in a trial today
<Forlorn> what did she do?
<JohnDough> nothing
<JohnDough> but the jury sure as hell thinks she did


Yes, I know this is just a random quote from IRC, but it's symptomatic of the kind of debased and immoral behavior typical of someone who lacks any belief in a higher power.

THe young man who wrote the quote at the top of this post is immoral,devoid of any respect for the law or authority. Why would ANYONE respect authority if they don't believe in a greater power?

The lost soul tho wrote those words is marooned in an anarchist morass, unable to see past the philosophy of "Do whatever you can get away with." Damned and lost, he's in for a shock when, on his death bed, he learns that there is not only a God, but that judgement is at hand.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Creation Science Museum Billboard vandalized.



A billboard for the Creation Science Museum has been vandalized. I'm still waiting for a reply from the curator of the Museum but the image speaks for itself. The billboard has been defaced with a contorted image of obtuse meaning. What exactly it's supposed to mean remains unknown, but members of my church are speculating that it may have a gang related meaning. If so, this would mean the Billboard was chosen not for what it advertised, but for the large white space that could be used for "tagging."

Either way, Satan has used his followers, be they actual Satanists or merely criminals, to attack an institution for standing against the tide of humanist propaganda that's attacking the nation.

Hopefully my friends within the Museum will be able to give me more information on the vandalism and what's being done about it.

Update

I heard back from some folks affiliated with the Creation Science Museum, and things get weirder and weirder.

First, the image is a reference to the "FSM" which is neither Satanic nor gang related. It is in fact a parody intended to make fun of the "Intelligent Design" theory.

Second, the image is a fake that had circulated on the Internet, BUT it inspired copycat vandalism on several Billboards as well as the Museum grounds itself. There's no effort to keep this quiet by the curators, but they aren't bothering to issue a lot of press releases either. It seems the billboards have been the targets of a LOT of vandalism and no one considers this newsworthy. It's just "More of the same from Satan."

The main reaction seems to be relief that it's something absurd instead of the usual pentagrams or vulgar anti-Christian slurs. One person wrote me and said "At least this one pretends to be clever."

Resolving some confusion about my religion

There have been a number of posts from people accusing me of being Catholic. These are slanderous lies.

Catholics are NOT Christians. They do not worship God, but instead worship a Pope and their precious "saints."

They pray to men and women, NOT to God. This makes them idolators and pagans. Their "Holy Relics" and other abominations damn them to Hell, and Satan will laugh at their sad fate as he torments them.

Millions, damned by a clever trick and vile perversion of God's word.

I am a Born Again Christian. Baptist to be specific.

While I appreciate the humor in some of the attacks launched against the Catholics by posters to my Blog, you need to realize they're misdirected if you're trying to attack me.

Auctions Ads

Cornswalled's Youtube Videos