Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, traitor and terrorist supporter.
Quick, someone send him some blow and whiskey, that will keep him busy until the end of his term.
It's pretty strange that he's pressing forward with this even though he's under investigation for accepting bribes from lobbyists. Oh, wait, he's a hypocrite, it's not strange at all.
The Democrats are willing to doom Iraq to generations of civil war, destroy our best chance at establishing a Democracy in the Middle East, empower our enemies and increase the threat of a terrorist attack on US soil, all so they can win a few more seats and perhaps the presidency in 2008.
The sick, twisted fact is within a year of a Democrat taking office, the terrorists will have the chance to launch another terrorist attack on US soil. The people will see the error of turning o the Democrats, and the democratic party will be dead in the water for the next 20 years.
I'm disgusted that it's going to take another terrorist attack on US soil to accomplish that, but the people are being mislead by false promises of peace and roses if we leave Iraq.
I've been getting more criticism, this time from an Anonymous poster, and I decided to reply to this round as a new post.
"No Christian Radicals have flown planes into US buildings, and the death toll
from Christian Radicals in the USA is easily under 100 for the last 50
years."
OK federal building!!! Are you kidding me!! You actually
forgot??
I know its hard to remember things Dumbya hasn't told you about.
I read the Bonobo article you linked to, and followed the sources. The "source" of the "Bonobos are bisexual" claim is Richard Wrangham. Further research on Wrangham reveals that his major claim to fame, aside from being the originator of the myth that Bonobos are bisexual, is a book entitled "Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence""The lie of Homosexual behavior in the animal kingdom has become so entrenched
through repetition that no one bothers to look into the actual sources."
Do you even research as much as you say you do?? Someone must be eyeing
the white house job looking through intelligence reports.Bonobos, heres a link (pun intended)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonobo
"it told a disturbing story of inductive research, extensive intervention byThe "research" upon which the "Bonobos are Bisexual" claim rests is, if YOU do a little research, based upon shoddy and suspicious "research" conducted by people who selectively discarded information that contradicted their claims.
the researchers themselves, affecting the apes' behaviour and ditching of
evidence which refuted the "demonic" hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis
presented was that the Gombe chimps are unusual, and their aggression owes more
to overcrowding within a shrinking area of forest than to any natural "demonic"
streak; other chimp colonies apparently show far lower levels of mutual
aggression, if any at all. The scariest moment came not from learning that the
legendary Frodo had killed and partially eaten a human baby, but from Dr
Goodall's apparent coldness towards this incident. Had a tiger or crocodile done
this, it would have been shot within days, but tigers and crocs don't have
glamourous young women anthropomorphising them in bestselling books or on
primetime TV."
Oh I almost forgot!!Jim Jones was not a Christian. He was a cult leader who used vaguely Christian teachings as part of his tapestry of lies. The universal rejection of Jim Jones and people like him by mainstream Christians is what one of many things that differentiates Christians from Muslims. If Muslims rejected and criticized Suicide Bombers with half the energy with which Mainstream Christians reject Jim Jones and the like, we wouldn't be having this debate because I never would have recommended banning Islam as a way to suppress terrorism.
cornswalled, do remember a man named Jim Jones.
That fucker killed almost a thousand people.
Do you ever go outside??
Its real pretty, but with all the people you hate I
see how its tough sometimes.
The original questions are in italics.
I am writing to enquire as to how you draw the conclusions evident on your website, but firstly I wish to make the following clear. I have, for the last year, been a listener of Distorted View. I have, at no point, been tempted to commit any sexual act with a minor, and I do not believe that any other listeners have. What you need to understand about Distorted View is that it is not meant to be taken seriously. We, the listeners, have all grasped this fact, and thus we have taken it to be, as it was intended, a comedy podcast.
Now, in a response to an enquiry from another listener, you mentioned that you would advocate making Islam illegal in the United States of America. This was, as you said, a measure taken to prevent terrorism in the U.S. Are you aware, however, that in the Koran, just as in the Bible, you can find verses advocating peace and those advocating violence? There are, you should understand, also Christian radicals.
There are countries in which the Bible has been banned dueto the conflicts between Christianity and other religions. I am sure that you are appalled by this. You want everyone to have the right to read and follow what you believe to be the only path to rightousness and eternal bliss. The same would be true for Muslims outside of the U.S.A. You must understand that there are other belief systems than yours. I have for 13 years of my life been a practicing Buddhist. Buddhism can be accreditted with being the only peacable religion in existence. I do not, however, wish to force my faith on others by illegalizing theirs. In fact the prospect is horrific. Everyone should be entitled to believe what they wish.
Secondly, you condemn homosexuality as being a crime against nature. Are you aware that there are plenty of examples within nature of homosexuality?
Humans themselves are also part of nature. What they choose to do, as long as is harms no others, is perfectly acceptable. Every should be entitled to do as they wish, so long as it does not conflict with my last statement. You also stated that 'an employer should be able to fire an employee for the sole reason that they are homosexual'. Try replacing the word homosexual with heterosexual. Or even blonde haired. Do you see how insane that sounds? Yet, if someone is entitled to fire someone because they are homosexual, why should someone with a different discrimination not be able to do the same? After all, it all comes down to different viewpoints so unless you want to persecute others for some kind of thought crime, I suggest you revise this statement. The depiction of homosexuals in the media is also subject to different points of view. It is all down to a viewers interpretation of the depictions. And just so you know, research shows absoloutly no correlation between homosexuality and pedophilia.
In response to your statements against implanting DNA between species, you cannot say that anything should cease because it violates biblical law. Biblical law advocates slavery, sexism and racism, and clearly is not applicable to modern society.
The United States of America has obscenity laws, and while the Bush Administrations is enforcing them to a greater extent than did the Clintons, obscenity is still allowed to run rampant on the Internet. Obscenity Advocates are quick to claim that software can be used to block many sites, but turn around and fight efforts to install such software on the grounds that it's a violation of Free Speech. We need to enforce our existing laws on the Internet. We don't have jurisdiction to shut down foreign operations, but we CAN keep the USA from being a haven for purveyors of Child Pornography. Many Pornographers lack the resources to move their operations overseas, which they would need to do if they wanted to continue operating. Just moving a server isn't enough if the company owner is living in the states.
Enforce the Law, and start shutting down the filth being peddled in the Untied States. We need to start fixing this problem at home.
Alexander Cornswalled
I've been crusading against the Distorted View podcast for a few weeks now, and my efforts to get the show pulled his a road block when I was informed that written descriptions of sex acts between minors was not covered by US Laws against Kiddie Porn.
Realizing this was a major stumbling block, I started doing more research into this claim, with the intention of writing my House and senate representatives seeking to have the law changed.
I was not surprised to learn that the interpretation of the law I'd been told by my critics was in fact, flawed.
The quoted case was R. v. Sharpe. The Wikipedia entry on the case includes the following text:
McLachlin, writing for the majority, held that the provision in the Code violated the freedom of expression but was justified under section one as the government objective of protecting children from exploitation was proportional to the violation.
The Court, however, finds that the provisions were too broad for including two types of material that should not constitute child pornography as they do not pose a direct potential harm to children. First, where the written or visual representations were created and possessed by the accused for exclusive personal use, and second, where "visual recordings created by or depicting the accused that do not depict unlawful sexual activity and are held by the accused exclusively for private use."
A man named Chris has asked me a series of questions, and these are my replies:
To start things off, yes I am a fan of DV. Rest asured though that there will be no profanity in this letter. I want to present to you a hypothetical situation and a series of questions that will follow it.
So far, Chris is showing more intelligence then most the other Distorted View Fans, which is why I'm replying.
Lets say, hyopthetically, that US law gave you, Alex, complete immunity to the law. You can legally do anything to/for/against anyone and anything at anytime you wish. Taking it a step further, God also grants you complete immunity to sin and guarentees a spot in heaven for you, regardless of what you've done. There are absolutely no consequences whatsoever to your words and actions. And for the iceing on the cake, you've been given complete and total control over every military on the planet.
An interesting set up. I will point out that I do not need the "guaranteed Spot in Heaven" you mentioned, as I already have that through the Blood of Christ.
The first question is how would you deal with other religious beliefs that arn't Christian? Or more specificly, Muslims?
I've advocated making Islam illegal in the United States as a means of cracking down on Terrorism. If I had the kind of global control in the question above it wouldn't be necessary to make Islam itself illegal. I would however demand the alleged "Moderate" and "Liberal"Muslims stand up and fight down the radicals in their midst. IF they shook off the cowardice that currently grips them (Assuming they even exist) then radical Islam could be stamped out within a generation.
If they fail in this, then terrorist organizations would be shut down and their members imprisoned. None of this "Let's negotiate and they MIGHT stop killing us" wishful thinking.
How would you respond to alternative sexual preferences as well as deviate ones? Gays? Lesbians? Phedophiles?
Pedophiles deserve the death penalty, plain and simple. They have no excuse to live, and the world as a whole will be better off if they're put to death.
I'm pleased to see that you've included Lesbians and Gays among Pedophiles. The overlap in these groups is extensive, and Deviants of all stripes need to be prevented from continuing their recruitment of the world's youth. While convicted Pedophiles are of course deserving of the death penalty, it's hard to justify and execution based on deviant acts with consenting adults.
To start, all of these absurd "Equal rights for Homos" laws need to go. If an employer is uncomfortable having gay employees, then they need the right to fire those people without repercussions. Criminalizing Homosexuality is difficult, as you get into a slippery slope of behavior. Would you fine and imprison a man because of one drunken mistake?
Next we need to stamp out positive images of Homosexuals in the media. It's an abomination and a crime against nature. We don't need television glorifying their lifestyle or claiming they have some sort of superior interior design sense because they're deviants.
They need to be on a watch list though, so we can keep them from harming children.
How do you feel about the progress of science and understanding and would you change it?
Cloning research and research that involves implanting DNA from one species into another are in violation of Biblical law, and must be stopped.
Stem Cell research that uses stem cells from murdered children must similarly be stopped. The hand wringers will no doubt continue to ignore the fact that stem cells from living adult donors show more promise and have resulted in more experimental treatments, but they're fixated on Stem cells from the Aborted, and would be disappointed to see me shut it down if I had the chance.
I've been on the fence about the Westboro Baptist Church for quite some time.
On one hand, they are telling people about the evils of Homosexuality, and are trying to warn the nation about the dangers of rejecting God's Law. They are unapologetic about their stance. These are, in and of themselves, admirable traits and I've even asked for their assistance in the past because of this.
On the other hand, I've heard rumors that Fred Phelps is in fact a plant, a ruse to vilify anyone who sees Homosexuality as a sin.
I'm recanting all requests I've ever made for help from Phleps, because it has become obvious to me that he can NOT be a serious activist. He MUST be a fraud created by the Liberal Media to make heroes out of Homosexuals.
Why would I make such a declaration?
Because he and his family are planning to protest at the funerals of people killed during the Virginia Tech shooting rampage.
This isn't an attempt to spread the word of God, or an attempt to warn people about the spiritual peril homosexuals face. This is a way to make anyone who opposes Homosexuality into a monster.
Look at his track record:
Yahoo Answers has been censoring attempts to provide moral answers to moral questions. If you respond with any kind of Bible based guidance, you're going to find your answer deleted. Here is an example.
A woman was complaining about marital problems with her husband. Specifically, she was a former "Adult Industry" worker who met her husband during the course of her "employment." after several year of marriage, her husband was no longer interested in having sexual relations with her. This husband was over twice her age, and had married her while she was in her 20's.
My response, which Yahoo Answers Deleted, was this:
You worked in the "Adult" industry??? That's your problem. By living an immoral
lifestyle, you attracted a husband who wanted a Jezebel and not a wife. He
married you for sex, not companionship or procreation. Now that you're slowing
down, you're suffering the repercussions of using whorish feminine wiles to
seduce a man into marrying you. You never had an equal partnership or a healthy
marriage. You were never more than a lust receptacle for him. You have the
following options:
1. Accept your role as a live in prostitute and
submit to your husband's deviant desires.
2. Seek counseling, preferably
from your clergy for guidance in changing the direction of your life. This is
what I would recommend. If both of you commit your lives to God and saving your
marriage, you may yet resolve your issues and forge a healthy marriage.
3. Accept the fact that sooner or later, you will be discarded. Maybe
he'll simply take up with a mistress. Perhaps he'll actually divorce you. He
might even be the type to arrange a "Jersey Divorce" to avoid alimony.
In the past, I've been supportive of Jack Thompson and his crusade against violent Video Games. As a result of repeated comments from both friends and critics, I recently sat down at a friend's computer and actually played one of these games.
Specifically, I played "America's Army" a video game produced by the government as a recruiting tool.
You know what? I want to recant my earlier comments about video games. Using a keyboard and a mouse to control weapons is NOTHING like actually handling a gun at a shooting range. I'm a damn good shot, and a damn good hunter, but I could barely pass the training levels in this computer game.
After playing the game for a while, I took my friend to the range. Despite the fact that he's a formidable opponent in computer games, he could barely hit the target when he handled a real gun. The kick from my hunting rifle was too much for him and almost knocked him over the first couple times he fired it.
I don't see how playing computer games is going to make you a better shot. Yeah, it might desensitize you to the idea of shooting a real person, but the TARGETS at the RANGE are designed to do that.
Are they "Murder Simulators?" Yeah, they are, but they aren't going to make you any better at shooting people. The skills to play a game and the skills to shoot a real gun don't overlap.
I've shot deer, Turkeys and a host of other animals, and the supposedly "realistic" "blood splatter" in these games is laughable. Anyone who trained themselves up to run out and shoot people using a game is going to find themselves unprepared for reality the first time they pull the trigger.
I'm all for ratings on these games, and enforcing the ratings by law if stores won't do it on their own, just like movies, but I see no reason why grown men can't sit down and play a game where they run around shooting fake bullets.
Paint ball does more to train folks to shot a REAL person than a video game. At least that gives you living targets and something resembling a real gun. If you want to run around banning games, you might as well ban paint ball too. Hell, you'd have to START with paint ball. If Paint ball is plain wholesome fun, then I don't see anything wrong with a video game where you play a soldier running around shooing terrorists, and I think Paint Ball is plain wholesome fun.
Apple causing a Microsoft product to crash?
Never.
Oh, wait, I know people who've installed iTunes on their PC. It's EXPECTED that any Apple software will not only crash, but cause massive data corruption.
I've sent a letter to Reverand Phelps of the Webstboro Baptist Church
Rev. Phelps,
I've been trying to shut down a Podcast called "Distorted View" with little success, other than a long string of abusive messages from the show's fans. I'm writing to solicit advice, and perhaps some assistance in shutting this man down. The show's URL is http://distortedview.com
I've written about this disgusting Podcast in my Blog on numerous occasions.
I first learned of this program because of a video he produced advocating Homosexual rape of underage boys. I wrote about it here:
http://www.cornswalled.com/2007/03/pedophiles-on-march.html
I started a petition to get his podcast shot down. I wrote about it here:
http://www.cornswalled.com/2007/03/podcasts-are-out-of-control.html
I learned that at least one young man, corrupted by the show, was suspended for his efforts to "promote" it on school grounds.
http://www.cornswalled.com/2007/04/was-student-suspended-over-distorted.html
Finally, after threats of lawsuits, they forced me to concede that, shocking enough, the content of the program DIDN'T qualify as child pornography under Federal law.
http://www.cornswalled.com/2007/04/distorted-view-and-pedophilia.html
Is there any advice you can offer? I have no real experience in social activism and want to do my part to purge these corrupt influences from America.
Yours in Christ,
Alexander Cornswalled
It's time to bring back the Disney Boycott
The Walt Disney Company has changed its policy to allow same-sex couples to have a Fairy Tale Wedding
All this was, of course, in response to a blog post by a Gay activist.
A Disney Apologist said, "We are not in the business of making judgments about the lifestyle of our guests. We are in the hospitality business and our parks and resorts are open to everyone,''
How exactly is letting Pedophiles and Homosexuals parade around your parks going to provide a welcoming environment for families looking for entertainment?
Is your Gay client list so large that you can afford to alienate American families in order to court them? I had no idea your musicals were so popular with gays, although I suppose that it isn't too surprising.
Disney had been boycotted for years for their flagrant support of the Gay Agenda, and this happens just two years after that nearly decade long boycott was ended. It;s clear that Disney has, once again, put money ahead of the law.
To make matters worse, this means Gay couples have MORE leeway at Disney than Heterosexual couples. Disney requires Heterosexual couples to have a valid marriage license to get married at one of their resorts or on one of their cruise ships. Even though Homosexuals can now get married in California, one of the states for which Disney accepts licenses, Gay and Lesbian couples can now BYPASS this requirement.
That's right folks. It's easier for Gays to have a wedding on Disney property than it is for Heterosexual couples.
Fortunately, most of these weddings aren't legally binding.
CONCORD, N.H. - The House took a historic step Wednesday toward joining neighboring Vermont and a handful of other states in approving civil unions for same-sex couples.
The House voted 243-129 for civil unions that would give same-sex couples the same rights, responsibilities, and obligations as married couples. Same-sex unions from other states would be recognized if they were legal in the state where they were performed.
For those unaware of Jack Thompson he is a lawyer crusading to eliminate pornographic and violent games form the stores. The general idea is to get the murder simulators and wife beating trainers off the shelves and either drive their producers out of business or at least drive them underground.
Manhunt, a game about literally hunting human beings like game, is one of his targets. It's form the same people who brought us the crime simulator "Grand Theft Auto."
In an attempt to strike out at Jack Thompson, a petition has been started to have him disbarred. Apparently they consider any attempt to censor or control their industry and the filth it produces to be a disbarring worthy offense.
So, because Jack Thompson is against selling "Murder simulators" to small children, the "Gaming Community" (Whatever that is) is up in arms.
What next, are these people going to demand we sell condoms to third graders? Lower the age of consent to 12? (Abolishing "age of consent" restrictions have been part of the stated Gay Agenda since 1978)
For those unaware of Jack Thompson he is a lawyer crusading to eliminate pornographic and violent games form the stores. The general idea is to get the murder simulators and wife beating trainers off the shelves and either drive their producers out of business or at least drive them underground.
Manhunt, a game about literally hunting human beings like game, is one of his targets. It's form the same people who brought us the crime simulator "Grand Theft Auto."
In an attempt to strike out at Jack Thompson, a petition has been started to have him disbarred. Apparently they consider any attempt to censor or control their industry and the filth it produces to be a disbarring worthy offense.
"kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out. . . . Such is the recompense of the unbelievers" (2.191)
The Koran promises "a disgraceful chastisement" (4.102) and "the fire of hell" (9.6) for "unbelievers,"
It orders Muslims not to "take the unbelievers for friends" (3.28).
"fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness" (9.123)
Please, tell me how these passages from the Koran tell Muslims to be nice to Christians and invite us over for tea?
The Old Testament "stone her for eating shrimp" style passages are part of the "Old Covenant" and were largely superseded by the Messiah. The old Purity laws, and their associated punishments, no longer apply, as Christians are no longer bound by them.
Islam has no such division between and "Old" and "New" covenant. They don't have a covenant of grace and love with God.
Muslims still apply such violent passages to their daily life. Christians do not.
A lot of people have been posting to my Blog about my stance on Homosexuality. They parrot the MSM line that it's "Not a choice" while trying to claim that the existence of Identical Twins where one twin is gay and the other straight somehow proves that Homosexuality isn't a choice. This line has been pushed with such ferver that Lesbians now make 35% more money than Heterosexual women.
Allow me to present a research paper that gives some actual figures, actual numbers and research into the sources of Homosexuality.
What Causes Homosexual Desire and Can It Be Changed?
There exist several Christian, Jewish and Muslim programs to help Homosexuals recover. Such programs would not exist and would have no attendees if there were no people who wanted to reclaim a normal sexuality. Setting that aside:
85% of these "lesbians" and 54% of these "homosexuals" reported sexual relations with someone of the opposite sex in adulthood,
67% of lesbians and 54% of homosexuals reported current sexual attraction to the opposite sex, and
82% of lesbians and 66% of homosexuals reported having been in love with a member of the opposite sex. (Source)
The vast majority of Homosexuals are only gay for a short period of time. Take a good look at the next gay rights rally. You'll notice that most of the people there are under 35. Despite the propaganda spewed by the Mainstream Media, this is not because they're all dying of AIDS. Research shows that most of them revert to a Heterosexual lifestyle later in life.
Homosexuality is largely a deviant behavior engaged in by young, rebellious youth, many of whom had absent or abusive parents. Despite the views of the few, yet highly vocal, Liberal Christians, Homosexuality thankfully remains a marginalized behavior.
My name is Cornswalled. A lot of people have found my Blog as a result of my protests against the Distorted View Podcast, and they've been posting all sorts of variations on my name. What they don't realize is they have YET to come up with a variation I haven't seen before.
I went to public school, and have been a very religious and moral individual my entire life. This results in a LOT of teasing by the ignorant and degenerate. To tell the truth, I'd find it refreshing if someone came up with a variation I haven't seen before.
So try showing some imagination children.
If you're really as creative and clever as you think you are, I'm sure you can think of something new. So far, I haven't seen ANYTHING that wasn't already an old stale line by fifth grade.
It has been brought to my attention that a written text describing sexual acts between children does not, shockingly enough, meet the legal definition of Child Pornography.
Despite the fact that Computer Generated Imagery DOES meet the legal definition of Child Pornography, a written text, or a recording of a voice reading that text, does not.
It would be an understatement to say that I'm shocked by this legal loophole, and I plan to write my congressman on this matter.
As a result of this legal loophole, I will be cease referring to "Tim Henson" as a Pedophile and cease using the term in reference to his Podcast, "Distorted View."
I have not removed or edited the old entries where I used the term, because doing so would be construed by many as an attempt to "Whitewash" the past.
I did not use the term hostilely, or with any attempt to defame "Tim Henson" but did so in what I believed at the time to be an accurate manner.
I would like to reiterate that I believe that Tim Henson's program meets a MORAL definition of Pedophilia and that it SHOULD be illegal to read such stories, but that is a fight I will not pursue at this time.
This does NOT however mean I will back down from efforts to get "Distorted View" shut down. It's still filled with morally apprehensible content that should NOT be available to minors, and I intend to continue fighting the program.
A school district violated a fourth-grader's constitutional rights to free speech and equal protection by refusing to allow her to distribute "personal statement" fliers carrying a religious message, a federal judge has ruled.
read more | digg story
Many claims have been made about the nature of Homosexuality, specifically, is it a choice or is it something you're "born" with.
A lot of research has been done, but the bottom line is, it;s generally considered a choice. The Homosexual group "Queer By Choice" even makes this fact one of the central tenants of their platform. Instead of trying to dance around questions of morality and what constitutes Natural behavior, they simply confess to deviance and move on.
A recent survey revealed that 70% of people believe that Homosexuality is a choice and not a biological imperative.
When the Head of the Human Genome project insists that Homosexuality is not
"Hard Wired" it's hard to continue claiming otherwise. The military lists Homosexuality as a Disorder, and top generals consider it a threat to the very function of individual military units.
People can protest all they want, but the bottom line is, there's just no reliable evidence to claim that Homosexuality is anything but a choice, something people decided to do despite it being against nature and an attack upon the very foundation of society.
There is, however, evidence that Homosexuality is more dangerous than smoking. Insert your own "Stick that in your pipe" joke here.Studies have shown that years of smoking shortens the lifespan of the smoker from 1 to 7 years. But analysis of the age of death in Norway and Denmark for gays who are legally married suggests that engaging in homosexual behavior reduces the lifespan by 24 years!
In Denmark, the country with the longest history of gay marriage, for 1990-2002, married heterosexual men died at a median age of 74yr., while the 561 partnered gays died at an average age of 51.
I've had some debates about the role twins play in determining is Homosexuality is a "Choice" or "Dictated." the bottom line is, there are plenty of twins where one twin is straight, the other gay. This proves that each twin is perfectly capable of making his or her own choices.
If Homosexuality were genetic, then both twins in a set would have the same sexual orientation, just like they have the same hair and eye color. The fact that twins exist where they have different sexual orientations proves that their status as individuals, their ability to make their own choices, the existence of free will is what allows them to decide their orientation.
Free will and not genetics dictate human behavior. DNA determines your appearance but not your morality, ethics or orientation. Being born to Jewish parents does not mean you HAVE to follow the Jewish Religion. Being born in poverty does NOT mean you HAVE to say there.
We have free will. We choose to follow God or to reject him.
I can only pray that the world's Homosexuals see the light and realize that this myth of Homosexuality being "decided" at birth is only holding them back and damning their souls.
Instead of using 10 Kilo German rabbits for breeding, the Gigantic bunnies were eaten by top North Korean officials.
I can see how the discussion went.
"We COULD use these rabbits to start a breeding program, and feed them cheep, easy to grow hay to get high quality meat."
"We could just have a REAL nice dinner."
"I Like that idea better!"
The rape of North Korea by it's own leaders continues.
Clearly not content with using illegally arrested UK soldiers in an attempt to goad the west into war, Iran has now "disappeared" an American.
This is all about Iran goading the USA into invading.
I hope to GOD Bush does away with any "Rebuilding" plans and just bombs them back to the stone age, then leaves them to internal secretariat fighting. If the local warlords are busy fighting for dominance, they won't have the chance or resources to fight us.
I have some thing to say to those arguing that the story "Tim Henson" read about a 12 year old being raped by a monster is "OK" because it's fiction.
You are ignorant of US federal law. Kiddie Porn, even simulated kiddie porn, has been held illegal.
Pedophiles were trying to get around Kiddie Porn laws by using CGI kids. The argument they used when caught was that since no actual children were used, it wasn't a crime.
The courts held that those who had copies of the CGI kiddie porn were subject to the same penalties as those who owned kiddie porn that used real children.
Under US Law, possessing, distributing or producing the fictional tale of a fictional child being raped by a fictional creature carries the same legal penalties as if Henson had played a recording of a REAL 12 year old being raped by a REAL person.
Whatever rationalizations you try to use, the bottom line is, the story is illegal.
Susan B. Anthony is quickly associated and quoted when it comes to feminism and the women movement. She fought for equal rights and the ability to be free of “men’s oppression.” What is never cited, though, is her vehement detest of abortion.
read more | digg story
It seemd the Distorted View Fans have been openly discussing the Pedophile content of the Podcast.
The Windowlicker
PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:58 am
Post subject: Most Recent Sextastic Tuesday
Wow.... Tim read a pedofiliac sextastic tuesday. Wondered how long untill he did that... Hmmm* oh well. F***ed up as it is, meh oh well.
piss_stream
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:48 pm
Was that his first pedo story? I thought the one with the re-re sucking his uncle's c**k was also pedo? P**** kisses!
LynkStar
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 10:24 am
He also did the predophile one with the mother/daughter felching.
Just to correct ye.
"i agree!Let's look at this more closely.
(Anonymous)
2007-04-02 01:55 pm UTC (link)
i agree that ur a fucking piece of shit!
u think a little entertainment like distorted view daily is destroying america mean while u discriminate against every one possible in your blog the only reason anyone has ever reasponded to your blog is to make fun of u, u really have no purpose of living. im 14 and i support dv constantly i ve beenb suspended from school for putting up distorted view daily flyers all over my school every time a teacher took one down i put a new one up, i hope u fucking burn in hell."
"i agree that ur a fucking piece of shit!"We can already see the kid can't write or spell properly. Is he lazy or just plain stupid? Then of course we get the stunning debate tactics of name calling and profanity. We're dealing with a real brain here folks.
"u think a little entertainment like distorted view daily isDistorted View is not destroying America on it's own, but is part of a larger social problem with permissive attitudes and the erosion of our nation's moral base.
destroying america"
"mean while u discriminate against every one possibleThat's a run-on sentence child. Learn to express yourself better. It's clear the kid hasn't read my blog very much because I do have a lot of supporting comments in other threads. As for the discrimination. yes, I discriminate against pornographers and pedophiles. I'm sorry this child look sup to such people as role models.
in your blog the only reason anyone has ever reasponded(sic) to your blog is
to make fun of u, u really have no purpose of living."
"im 14 and i support dv constantly"So, you're one of the "Underage Listeners" Distorted view's web site warns away, but the corrupting host of the show welcomes with open arms, making crass comments about molesting you. What has this program done to your young, impressionable mind?
"i ve beenb suspended from school for putting up distorted view daily flyers all over my school"Ah, there it is. The kid desperately needs his education, and promoting Distorted View has taken precedence over his schooling.
"every time a teacher took one down i put a new one up,"And he fails to learn form his mistakes. He's mislead, uneducated and apparently fairly stupid.
"i hope u fucking burn in hell."Hope all you want. I'm the one whose saved and washed clean in the blood of the lamb.
