More about Homosexuals
A lot of people have been posting to my Blog about my stance on Homosexuality. They parrot the MSM line that it's "Not a choice" while trying to claim that the existence of Identical Twins where one twin is gay and the other straight somehow proves that Homosexuality isn't a choice. This line has been pushed with such ferver that Lesbians now make 35% more money than Heterosexual women.
Allow me to present a research paper that gives some actual figures, actual numbers and research into the sources of Homosexuality.
What Causes Homosexual Desire and Can It Be Changed?
There exist several Christian, Jewish and Muslim programs to help Homosexuals recover. Such programs would not exist and would have no attendees if there were no people who wanted to reclaim a normal sexuality. Setting that aside:
85% of these "lesbians" and 54% of these "homosexuals" reported sexual relations with someone of the opposite sex in adulthood,
67% of lesbians and 54% of homosexuals reported current sexual attraction to the opposite sex, and
82% of lesbians and 66% of homosexuals reported having been in love with a member of the opposite sex. (Source)
The vast majority of Homosexuals are only gay for a short period of time. Take a good look at the next gay rights rally. You'll notice that most of the people there are under 35. Despite the propaganda spewed by the Mainstream Media, this is not because they're all dying of AIDS. Research shows that most of them revert to a Heterosexual lifestyle later in life.
Homosexuality is largely a deviant behavior engaged in by young, rebellious youth, many of whom had absent or abusive parents. Despite the views of the few, yet highly vocal, Liberal Christians, Homosexuality thankfully remains a marginalized behavior.
8 comments:
you assertion of identical twins being proof positive that your sexuality is a choice is an invalid argument. Since you have no facts to back up that: a)sexuality is a choice, and b) all identical twins are exactly the same. The same genes do not make the exact same person phenotypically. next, a Ph.D behind someones name doesn't make a valid argument for proof either. The Family Research Institute is a ring-wing organization that doesn't like homosexuals ('research' is bias, laughable to call it research) and the article is not peer-reviewed and would not stand up to be published in an authentic scientific journal. Lastly, just because you prefer to live your life with a person of the same sex doesn't mean you don't look at the opposite sex, so you stats are pointless. Your whole argument is pointless. oh, unless YOU are having trouble with yourself thinking of men when you jack off.
and who, exactly, wrote that research paper? another right-wing fucktard? I thought so
Being a douche bag hate monger can be changed, but probably not in your case.
I'd rather be around gay people than a hate filled evil piece of shit like you.
LICK MY STINK BOX!!!
Here are some facts about Paul Cameron, the author of the "research" article you present as fact. Since this "research" was not published by a peer reviewed journal it holds no water in academia.
http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_cameron_sheet.html
TAKEN FROM A DOCUMENT KICKING PAUL CAMERON OUT OF THE AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron, a psychologist, was dropped from membership in The American Psychological Association for violation of the Preamble to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists;
WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron has been presented in the media as a sociologist;
WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented sociological research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism;
WHEREAS Dr. Paul Cameron has repeatedly campaigned for the abrogation of the civil rights of lesbians and gay men, substantiating his call on the basis of his distorted interpretation of this research;
WHEREAS the American Sociological Association is on record as opposing oppressive actions against lesbians and gay men and affirming its commitment to their civil rights;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: THAT the Association reaffirms its opposition to efforts to undermine the civil rights of lesbians and gay men through the distortion of sociological concepts and the falsifying of sociological research; and
THAT the Association articulates this opposition by charging the Committee on the Status of Homosexuals in Sociology with the task of critically evaluating and publicly responding to the work of Dr. Paul Cameron.
"Take a good look at the next gay rights rally. You'll notice that most of the people there are under 35...because most of them revert to a Heterosexual lifestyle later in life."
your logic is flawless
As already pointed out by other comments, Paul Cameron is a throughly discredited source. I'd like to ask about some other logical fallacies in this post:
- You mention that lesbians have a higher average income. This is called a Non Sequitor, since it is unrelated to choice or any other point you are attempting to make.
- You say, "Take a good look at the next gay rights rally. You'll notice that most of the people there are under 35."
Tell us the truth, please; Have YOU ever been to a Gay Rights rally? Physically? Because if you had, you would have noticed that your statement is not true.
- "Despite the propaganda spewed by the Mainstream Media, this is not because they're all dying of AIDS."
This makes no sense at all. No reputable media sources have suggested that most or all gay people contract or die from AIDS.
Mr. Cornswalled, I say this for your own good; Put aside the extremist propaganda, consider the realities of the situation from an objective, rational angle, and seriously consider the possibility that all these preconceived notions of yours are wrong.
Post a Comment