It's legal for the states to ban Islam

Yes, yes, the Constitution declares "Congress shall make no law ... respecting an establishment of religion."

What people forget, is that this dictum was never meant to drive a wedge between the state and religion. Quite the opposite.

Many of the founding 13 colonies had state religions. The wording of the Bill of Rights is clear, particularly where it declares "'All the power that is not expressly delegated to the federal government is reserved for the states."

Pat Robertson said it best:

"The first point in the Bill of Rights, the First Amendment to the Constitution, said 'Congress shall pass no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.' There were certain states at that time that had established religions. Massachusetts was a case in point. They had a state religion. And they didn't want this enormously powerful Congress to superimpose a religious system on their state system. To guarantee the states retained critical rights, the tenth amendment said, 'All the power that is not expressly delegated to the federal government is reserved for the states.' The intent? The people -- i.e. the states -- have delegated power. They gave up some powers, but they did not give up all powers because they are sovereign states."

Source:http://www.patrobertson.com/Statesman/StatesRights.asp

What does this mean for the War on Terror?

To start with, it means that it's legal for the states to pass laws to prohibit a given religion. In this case, Islam.

Once Islam is illegal, you can start rounding up the terrorists and prospective terrorists on far easier grounds than proving they had an active plot to bomb the Sears Tower. Questioning them becomes easier, detaining them becomes easier and it's damn hard to orchestrate a terror attack from prison.

The benefits are immeasurable. All it would take is for a few states to make Islam illegal.

Let's say New York State is the first to ban Islam. Suddenly, anyone flying through a NYC airport or driving down an state road is subject to detention and arrest for praying to the Muslim Moon God Allah.

How many of the 9/11 hijackers would have been thwarted by this?

If Massachusetts had outlawed Islam before 9/11/2001 the hijackers would have been unable to hijack the planes they subsequently few into the World Trade Center and The Pentagon.

It's time we took a real stand against the perpetrators of violence, and outlawed a theology based on the murder of those who don't follow it.

They call it "the religion of peace" but their own religious book dictates unbelievers be killed. They seem to enjoy following that rule. If they're so eager to slaughter us, then I say we start by kicking them out of our country.

"Crowds were bathing until late into the night."

Millions of Hindus take holy bath

"The planetary alignment is such that sun rays, when they fall on the Ganges, turn the river water into nectar. So bathing here today is equivalent to drinking nectar," he says.

Next year, try adding some soap.

And call a Dentist while you're at it.

OBorat

Harry Potter stunt double paralyzed on set

A few years ago the "last" Harry Potter book was released concurrently with the movie. Commercials bragged that you could watch "The thrilling climax" on the big screen. Well, it turns out the movies are going to keep going after the books have finished, and the filming of the latest installment of witch boy Harry Potter's ongoing attack on Christ has crippled his stunt double.

Daniel Radcliffe’s stunt double has suffered serious spinal injuries on the set of the latest Harry Potter film.

David Holmes was rehearsing a flying scene involving an explosion when he plummeted to the ground.

He remained conscious but told crew members: ‘I can’t feel my legs.’ He was taken to hospital as fears grew that he had suffered a paralysing back injury.

This is, of course, just the beginning of God's judgment on this satanic enterprise. After years of plodding along, stretching out a tired old premise, the hand of judgment is coming down upon the people responsible for this abomination, this insult to Christ. This initial injury is just a warning, and I hope it leads David Holmes to reject the evils of his past and embrace Christ.

The people responsible for "Harry Potter" are in far more trouble than they think. They've insulted God, compounding that insult and leading children to reject Christ in favor of witchcraft and the fantasies of witchcraft. God's judgment will be harsh for those who do not repent.

I know there are people who have wanted to take their own action, o try and carry out God's judgment as human agents of divine wrath. I urge anyone with such motives to stay your hand. God has shown he's perfectly capable of dealing with these people. "Judgment is mine" says the Lord. It is our responsibility to teach, to minister, to educate and spread God's word, not to carry out judgment with our own hands.

Should New York REALLY Rename the GWB?

A few weeks ago I posted about the grassroots movement to rename the George Washington Bridge in New York City to the George W Bush Bridge. I recently added a link to the Podcast feed for this post, but for some reason it isn't showing up in iTunes, so I'm posting a fresh link to the Podcast above.

Hopefully, THIS post to the podcast will show up in the feed.

I've also created a Youtube Video of the podcast.

A return to action

I haven't been online much lately. The Church is growing by leaps and bounds and now we're drawing in parishioners from over 30 miles away! Membership has tripled in the last six months and the we've added a second Sunday Service to accommodate the growing congregation. I've been overseeing some of the preliminary work for a new expansion. We're adding a weekday day care center and a cry room off the Narthex. Everyone is very excited and the preparations are taking up a lot of time.

The day care is a pilot program for higher ambitions. We hope to open a private school within the next two years. The day care will help us gauge interest in Christian education in the area. The ongoing liberalization of the public schools have left many people disenchanted and yearning for something better.

I've been getting a lot of e-mail the last few days about Tim Henson and his "Distorted View" podcast. Apparently he was talking about me on a recent episode. People want to know how I feel about the fact that he's still on the air. My answer is, I don't mind. After some initial confrontations I forced him to end his "Sextastic Tuesday" skit, and while I've been told he occasionally revives it, he no longer used underage characters in the pornography he reads. While vile, disgusting and juvenile, the program is for the moment legal. I'm preparing a letter writing campaign to the FCC, asking them to apply FCC broadcast regulations to US produced Podcasts and web sites. The initial response has been encouraging, but with most my efforts focused on the Church, progress has been slow.

I'm surprised at how many people thought FCC guidelines were already being applied to US produced web sites. A big part of the education process is showing people that obscenity laws are being outright ignored, and that the current crop of Internet Filtering technology fails to adequately block adult web sites. Once people understand this, their support for law to bring the FCC into regulating the Internet is easy to procure.


I hope to have more news soon.

The wasted career of Charles Darwin

Update by Peter Cornswalled:
Pursuant to the wishes of my late brother, Alexander, his extensive body of writing will be published. This article is now available for your Kindle in both English and Spanish

The original author of this article has granted me permission to publish it, but has asked that his name not be connected to it, do to left leaning ideologies that have subsequently infected his thinking.

In the late 1800's Charles Darwin introduced his now infamous book, The Origin of Species. This work introduced what is now known as Darwinian evolution. Evolution however was nothing new, "The Greeks believed in a form of evolution," centuries before the birth of Jesus Christ. (Ham, 100) The Origin of Species was destined to change the course of history and cause the re-evaluation of Victorian morality. It would be said that the evolutionary model "Helped make atheism respectable." (Ham, 85) The assumptions necessary to support the evolutionary model would weaken science and result in the bias of a scientist and not the facts determining the results of experiments and field research. It would compel Cesare Lombroso to form a criteria for the identification of the criminal element based upon physical characteristics such as the subject's brow ridge and eye shape. Darwin's model would be applied to the business world to justify ruthless business tactics and excuse, even glorify, maltreatment of the lower classes. It would penetrate the religious community and result in the formation of the theocratic evolutionists. Finally, it would allow society to remove God and his moral absolutes. This final result would cause the persecution of Christian values and beliefs and the formation of numerous misconceptions about Christianity. The resulting removal of moral absolutes would legitimize abortion and prompt so-called "mercy killings" and provide a new basis for racial prejudice. The Evolutionary model of origins would impact not only science, but criminology, business, religion, and basic morality.

The coward who could save billions of lives

Sometimes a brave man comes forward and saves lives, often giving his won life for the sake of others. Sadly it's more common for people to sit in their tiny hole, cowardly protecting themselves for fear of being persecuted for telling the truth.

Then there are the truly reprehensible people, the ones who make an empty, useless gesture to assuage their conscience even though it accomplishes noting to actually save anyone. It's that kind of reprehensible coward I'm writing about today.

One of the clearing houses for vaccine information is hardtruth.navhost.com One one of that site's pages there's an interview with a former vaccine researcher. That man comes clean about the dangers and lies surrounding vaccines, blowing the lid off the conspiracies and money grubbing that has lead to billions being injected with poison.

The problem is the man, the researcher remains anonymous. He doesn't even reveal which vaccines he worked on for fear of being identified. He gives some lame excuses for his secrecy on the web site, but let's be honest, if I were in a position to save BILLIONS of lives, even if it were to cost me my own life, I'd do it. Standing up to evil requires courage and faith, but this researcher has neither.

He never reveals any proof of his or her claims or gives any reason why we should believe them. The fear of being persecuted is cowardly, especially since this person is claiming vaccines are part of a plan to kill over 3 billion people.

Aside from the fact that this unknown voice is saying things we agree with, what proof do we have of their honesty? I ask this because the major hurdle I encounter in arguing against vaccination is that people are more inclined to trust a man in a lab coat than an anonymous interviewee on a web site.

Does anyone have additional information on this researcher? Is there a way of verifying his story? I'd hoped for someone who had come out who could prove they had worked on specific vaccines, but this person is letting the fear of FBI and IRS harassment keep him from really stepping forward in a case that could save the lives of 3 Billion people! If this coward really came forward he could save lives. Is there a way to drag him into the light?

By refusing to come forward, he allows his critics to continue ignoring him. He severely limits the number of people who will believe him. As it is he's only reinforcing the beliefs of the people who already know the truth about vaccines. No one will be swayed by such an unknown and unverified source! All he's doing is preaching to the choir.

His fear is rank cowardice. He values his own life more than the lives of half the planet. The hubris and arrogance that lead him to become a vaccine researcher has not left him.

He could be saving millions, perhaps BILLIONS of lives. Instead he's hiding under a rock like an insect. He may have "come forward" but he hasn't atoned for what he's done. His interview is an empty gesture, useless for teaching people the truth.

He's an accomplice to genocide, and by continuing to hide he's remaining an accomplice. The blood of millions is upon his hands.

The Skeptics Guide Responds

The Skeptics Guide to the Universe has already issued a response to my review of their Podcast. To tell the truth I'm somewhat surprised they replied. Normally the subject of one of my reviews has a thread about it in their own discussion forum and leaves it at that.

The review was written by Rebecca Watson of the SGU. She's the female host of the program. Most of the male hosts share a surname and are, I assume, related.

In her review she replies to the points I made that she felt most relevant and in need of commentary. She also complimented her fans on their replies to my original review, and plunged into a few other pages of my blog to point out where she disagreed with me on issues like vaccination.

I have little to say about her review. It's largely the kind of rationalization I've come to expect. I do however want to make a few points.

She comments on my post "The Coward who could save Billions of Lives." In it she criticized me for accepting the word of an anonymous source, clearly ignoring the fact that the entire POINT of the post was my complaining about the fact that the source is in fact anonymous. Such cherry picking attempts at criticism fall flat when you read my actual article about the unknown vaccine researcher and his claims.

Surely she can admit that if the interview is genuine and accurate then serious questions about the safety of vaccines are raised. The problem is, the source is refusing to come forward and reveal himself. This is a cowardly act if the interview is genuine. Miss Watson and myself agree on the fact that the source needs to come forward.

She further comments on my mention of the fiction of "Separation of Church and State" and pretends I was criticizing the Founding Fathers with the comments. She admits the phrase "Separation of Church and State" never appears in the Constitution and even quotes the passage revisionists use to cram the "Separation" claim into the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . .

What I didn't spell out in my SGU review is that I do not blame the Founding Fathers, most of them pastors, for the fiction of "Separation of Church and State." The frequent appeals to God in their writing and the overall bodies of their works, make it clear that they saw Christendom as the cornerstone of the nation.

The myth of a church / state barrier was injected years, even decades later by humanist thinkers seeking to exclude God from the pubic sphere. I think my understanding of the Constitution's actual words is highlighted in my essay "It's legal for the states to ban Islam." The Constitution's goal was to prevent the Federal Government from making a national religion, in part because many of the original 13 states already HAD an official religion.

The Fed is banned from making laws regarding religion, not the states. A stab against federal hegemony is being misused to alienate God himself.

Finally, she goes over some of my previous podcast reviews and agrees with most of them. I guess there's hope for her after all.

Horrifying new date rape drug cocktail leaves permanent damage

This news has been circulating back home and around the school where I'm attending pre-seminary classes. The implications are truly horrifying. My hope is that news of this will spread far and wide so we can put a stop this this horrible violation.

On Saturday, January, 7, 2009, a woman at a Boston night club was kidnapped by 5 men, who according to hospital and police reports, gang raped her before dumping her. Unable to remember the events of the evening, tests later confirmed the repeated rape along with traces of Rohypnol in her blood, with Progesterex, which is essentially a small sterilization pill. This drug is now being used by rapists at parties to rape and sterilize their victims. Progesterex is available to vets to sterilize large animals.
Rumor has it that Progesterex is being used together with Rohypnol, the date rape drug.

As with Rohypnol, all they have to do is drop it into the girls drink. The girl can't remember a thing the next morning, of all that had taken place the night before. Progesterex, which dissolves in drinks just as easily, is such that the victim doesn't conceive from the rape and the rapist needn't worry about having a paternity test identifying him months later.

The drugs effects are not temporary- They are permanent! Progesterex was designed to sterilize horses. Any female who takes it will never be able to conceive. Rapists can get this drug from anyone who is in vet school at any university. It's that easy, and Progesterex is about to break out big everywhere. Believe it or not, there are even sites on the Internet selling it and telling people how to use it.

Attacks involving Progesterex have been reported in 48 of the 50 US states, with only Hawaii and Utah having so far been untouched by Progesterex. As of March 4, 2009, there have been 5,320 women in the US alone known to have been permanently sterilized as part of a sexual assault.